Handlebars.js separates HTML structure from the JavaScript that fills it with data — instead of building markup with string concatenation, you write a template with {{placeholders}} and compile it against a data object. Here’s what it actually looks like, where it fits, and where a real framework is the better call instead.
In this post: A basic example · Helpers and partials · Escaping, and the triple-stash you should rarely use · Precompiling templates for production · Where it’s actually used · Handlebars vs. a real framework · Pros and cons · When would you actually use this? · Related reading
A basic example
Include the library:
Define a template:
Compile it against real data:
document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', () => {
const source = document.getElementById('entry-template').innerHTML;
const template = Handlebars.compile(source);
const context = {
title: "My New Post",
body: "This is my first post!"
};
const html = template(context);
document.body.innerHTML = html;
});
Helpers and partials
“Logic-less” doesn’t mean templates can’t loop or branch — Handlebars ships built-in block helpers for exactly that, without letting arbitrary JavaScript leak into the template:
{{#if isPublished}}
Published
{{else}}
Draft
{{/if}}
{{#each comments}}
- {{this.author}}: {{this.text}}
{{/each}}
And partials are the actual reusability mechanism — a template registered once and reused inside others, so a repeated chunk (a card, a comment, a nav item) has one source of truth instead of being copy-pasted into every template that needs it:
Handlebars.registerPartial('comment', document.getElementById('comment-partial').innerHTML);
// Then, inside another template:
// {{> comment}}
Escaping, and the triple-stash you should rarely use
Worth knowing before this ends up handling anything user-supplied: {{title}}-style double-stash output is HTML-escaped automatically — if title contains <script> or a stray &, Handlebars renders it as inert text, not executable markup. That default is what makes it safe to drop untrusted data (a comment, a form submission, a name) straight into a template without hand-rolling escaping yourself.
There’s a second syntax that turns that protection off entirely — triple-stash, {{{body}}}, renders the value as raw, unescaped HTML. It exists for a real reason: sometimes the data genuinely is HTML you want rendered as HTML (a rich-text field from a CMS, a pre-sanitized snippet). But reaching for it on anything that traces back to user input — a comment field, a profile bio, a URL parameter — reopens exactly the XSS hole the double-stash default exists to close. If a value needs triple-stash, sanitize it (a library like DOMPurify) before it reaches the template, don’t rely on the source being “probably fine.”
Precompiling templates for production
Everything above compiles a template in the browser, on every page load — fine for a small site, wasteful once there are more than a handful of templates or the compiler itself becomes a meaningful chunk of what ships to every visitor. The handlebars npm package includes a standalone precompiler for exactly this: it turns a template into plain JavaScript ahead of time, so the browser never runs the parser/compiler at all, just the already-generated render function.
npm install -g handlebars
# Compile every .handlebars file in templates/ into one minified bundle
handlebars templates --output public/js/templates.js --min
The real production payoff isn’t just skipping the parse step — it’s that a precompiled template no longer needs the full Handlebars compiler shipped to the client at all, only the much smaller runtime build (handlebars.runtime.js). Swap the full library for the runtime version once every template that page needs is precompiled, and the compiler’s code weight simply isn’t downloaded. If every helper the templates use is already known at build time, adding -k each -k if -k unless (one flag per known helper) shrinks the generated output further and speeds up rendering, since the compiler doesn’t have to emit a runtime lookup for helpers it could resolve directly.
Where it’s actually used
- Server-side rendering: pairs naturally with Node.js/Express to generate HTML before it hits the client.
- Static site generators: tools like Assemble and Metalsmith use it for reusable page templates.
- CMS theming: Ghost’s theme system is built on Handlebars templates.
- Transactional email templates: Handlebars-style
{{merge tags}}syntax shows up across several email platforms’ templating systems — worth checking your specific provider’s docs, since implementations vary in how closely they match the full Handlebars spec.
“Logic-less” doesn’t mean templates can’t loop or branch — Handlebars ships built-in block helpers like #if and #each for exactly that, without letting arbitrary JavaScript leak into the template.
Handlebars vs. a real framework
Handlebars fits small sites, prototypes, and anywhere you need templated HTML without framework overhead. React, Vue, or Angular earn their setup cost once you actually need complex state management, heavy interactivity, or a team working across a large, evolving codebase where the framework’s conventions keep everyone consistent. Reaching for a framework to render a handful of templated pages is over-engineering in the other direction — match the tool to the actual complexity, not to what’s trendy.
Pros and cons
Strong: intuitive syntax, real separation between markup and logic, reusable partials/helpers, no framework overhead for simple templating needs.
Weak: deliberately limited logic — anything genuinely complex has to live outside the template. It’s a templating engine only, with no built-in event handling or DOM diffing, so state changes and re-renders are on you to manage. And template management itself gets harder to keep organized once an app has dozens of them, without a framework’s conventions imposing structure.
When would you actually use this?
- A static site or simple server-rendered app needs templated HTML without pulling in a full frontend framework.
- You’re generating email content from user data and want a clean separation between the email’s structure and the data filling it.
- You’re prototyping quickly and don’t want framework setup overhead standing between you and seeing something render.
References: handlebarsjs.com, npm package, GitHub repo.
Related reading
- Exploring Gulp and Gulp-CLI — Handlebars templates commonly get compiled as a build step in a Gulp pipeline, alongside Sass and JS minification.
- TypeScript: What, Why and How?! — another lightweight-vs-full-tooling tradeoff, if you’re weighing how much infrastructure a project actually needs.
Worth a look for anything that needs templated HTML without full framework weight. Questions? Comment below.
App Catalog Authentication Automation Backup Compliance Content Type CSS Flows Google Javascript Limitations List Metadata MFA Microsoft Node NodeJs O365 OneDrive Permissions PnP PnPJS Policy PowerApps Power Automate PowerAutomate PowerPlatform PowerShell React ReactJs Rest API Rest Endpoint Security Send an HTTP Request to SharePoint SharePoint SharePoint List SharePoint Modern SharePoint Online SPFX SPO Sync Tags Teams Termstore Versioning


